Teaming
Up Trenchless Techniques:
|
|
|
During a drill stem recovery the principal is the same, however,
there are two possible tool configurations. Depending on the situation,
contractors may opt to remove the drill stem from the ground or,
if the stem is still attached to the drill rig, they may choose
to push on the stem while the drill rig pulls back.
Orton said, "In these situations typically the contractor
has run out of options and is looking to salvage the project. As
most know, drill stems can be very expensive, so leaving them stuck
in the ground is not desired. Product pipe, obviously, is very
expensive as well. The last thing anyone wants to do is leave it
in the ground as an incomplete bore. Plus, by removing it, the
contractor now has the opportunity correct the original problem
and bore again."
|
|
Pull Back Assist
The pullback assist method works directly on getting the product pipe installed. Drilling underwater or in loose flowing soil conditions a condition known as hydrolock can occur. Orton said, "Hydrolock is a situation were the external pressure being put on the product pipe from ground water pressure, drilling fluid pressure and/or soil conditions exceeds the drill rigs pullback capability or the product pipes tensile strength. The percussive action of a pipe rammer in this situation can help free the immobilized pipe."
The pullback assist technique has been successfully used on steel pipe, as well as HDPE. The technique can be used as a safety measure in anticipation of hydrolock problems or after the pipe has become immobilized (See Diagram C). According to Orton, time is a key factor with any of these methods. He said, "Reaction time is always important. Not hesitating to mobilize needed equipment and expertise in these situations can really make the difference between success and failure. Success rates improve dramatically depending upon how quickly problems are responded to. In fact, a number of drilling contractors are starting bring ramming equipment to directional drilling sites as a form of insurance in case problems develop."
|
|
Conductor
Barrel
The Conductor Barrel process differs slightly from the other
three methods in the sense that it deals with the actual drilling
aspect of the project rather than pullback or recovery. The concept
behind the Conductor Barrel is creating a clear pathway through
poor soil conditions so that drilling can begin in more preferable
soil conditions. The success of a drilling operation can often be
determined right at the start. If drilling does not begin in soil
that is conducive to drilling, the success of the entire project
can be put in jeopardy. Loose, unsupported soils are prime candidates
for the Conductor Barrel method.
During the Conductor Barrel process, casings are rammed into the
ground, at a predetermined angle, until desirable soil conditions
are met. The spoil is removed from the casing with an auger or core
barrel. Drilling proceeds within the casing in the desirable soil
conditions. In addition to assisting drilling operations at the
start, the conductor can also serve as a friction-free section during
pullback (See Diagram D).
Orton said, "The conductor barrel technique is often used
for river or water crossings. The length of the conductor barrel
is determined by soil conditions, the angle of the bore and the
depth of the crossing below the waterway. Regardless, it is imperative
for drilling to begin in suitable soil conditions. In addition,
the conductor barrel can prevent situations in unstable soils where
drilling fluids under pressure force their way into waterways or
wetlands, acting in a similar fashion to containment cells."
Drilling contractors throughout North America have successfully
employed all four directional assist techniques.
|
|
Cherrington
Corporation Tackles Tough River Crossing with Conductor Barrel Technology
by Jim Schill
|
|
With over 30 years of
experience in directional drilling and ties to the method's origins,
Cherrington Corporation, Sacramento, CA is regarded as one of the
most knowledgeable and experienced horizontal directional drilling
(HDD) contractors in the world. A recent project in Vancouver, WA
highlights the contractor's ability and resourcefulness.
The project in Vancouver called for the installation of a 12-inch
steel conduit, approximately 5,500 feet under the Columbia River
to a point just west of Portland, OR. Once installed, the conduit
would house 14 smaller, PE fiber-optic cable conduits.
Once on site, Cherrington Operations Manager, Mark Parsons knew
drilling would be difficult. According to Parsons, the soil conditions
at the start of the project were not conducive to drilling operations.
He said, "The soils that we encountered in the beginning were
unconsolidated cobbles and boulders and basically not drillable.
Because of the unconsolidated nature of the formation, maintaining
the bore-hole trajectory was not possible due to a lack of bore-hole
integrity. We tried several different methods to successfully penetrate
and steer through the formation. In this industry, we are all eternal
optimists. We like to think that the next foot is going to be better
drilling." The soil conditions did not improve and Parsons
was forced to re-evaluate the situation.
|
|
After
discussions with the client, it was decided that the only way
to get through this formation was to use the Conductor Barrel technique.
TT Technologies Product Specialist Collins Orton was contacted
to arrange delivery of a pneumatic pipe rammer for a Conductor
Barrel installation. Orton delivered an 18-inch diameter Grundoram Goliath and equipment for ramming a 24-inch and 30-inch diameter
conductors. Crews began ramming a 30-inch diameter lead casing
at a 16.5-degree angle. Parsons explained that the angel of
the bore had to be altered from the original drilling angle
in order for the conductor barrel to reach the drillable formation
quickly. More sections of the 30-inch casing were added and
ramming continued until the conductor barrel reached 156-ft
mark.
At this point, they met resistance and the decision was made to
ram a smaller casing inside of the 30-inch casing. Crews removed
the spoil from the 30-inch casing with an auger and a core barrel.
Once spoil was removed, the crew set up for ramming 40-foot long,
24-inch diameter casings inside of the original casing. Over the
course of the next several days, crews welded and rammed the 24-inch
diameter casing sections to a depth of 325 feet. At 325 feet, the
Cherrington crew removed more spoils from the casings and then installed
a 10 3/4-inch wash-over casing for centralization of the drill pipe.
The conductor barrel actually created an unobstructed raceway through
the unconsolidated cobbles and boulders and to the drillable formation.
After reaching the drillable formation, the Cherrington crew was
able to complete a 5,500-foot pilot bore-hole under the river.
After removing the 10 3/4-inch wash-over pipe, the crew forward
reamed and ultimately pulled back the 12-inch steel conduit successfully.
Parsons said, "We've been forced to use the Conductor Barrel
technique in the past where nothing else would work and I'm sure
we'll use it again in the future if circumstances warrant. It's
a viable option when confronted with impossible drilling conditions."
Trenchless Technology, August 2002












